| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Drogo Drogos wrote: From Super pilots to burned out nullsec players getting fed up with constand defence fleets day in day out. I dunno, I'm tentatively looking forward to seeing if these changes'll turn into more small fleets engaging other ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.09 12:55:46
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lurifax wrote: It was a way to drive the logistical ppl crazy. But the system scaled. Indeed, but the logistics people would be slightly less crazy now, what with all the tools we've been given after dominion sov came into play. And it not ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.09 09:42:41
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Primary This Rifter wrote: You're quoting the person that I was quoting as me. Turns out I'm lazy AND crap at fixing quotes. Who knew. Primary This Rifter wrote: In any case, I wasn't around back then. I don't actually know much about how...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.09 09:26:16
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Primary This Rifter wrote: You think the new sov mechanics look fun? I fear for the future of Eve. - - - - - - - - - Mini games have NO place in sov wars. What do you think the old POS sov mechanics were?
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.09 09:11:18
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Or that people fight on ESSes, or even... the sun 1v1 at the sun m8
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 23:24:43
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: That's a LOT of iskies in moon goo that most line members never get to touch. Except for those who get SRP.
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 21:28:46
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Eli Apol wrote: I hazarded a guess at 7 trillion/month for just R64s across the whole of nullsec based on data a few years old... completely passively going into alliance pools without any industry indices ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 20:37:09
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Eli Apol wrote: If anyone is willing to actually post an uptodate value on those R32s and R64s by the way, just so we know how much income is never seen by the line members of those 40k strong alliances in ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 20:03:08
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: If anyone is willing to actually post an uptodate value on those R32s and R64s by the way, just so we know how much income is never seen by the line members of those 40k strong alliances in this poor nullsec that we keep hearing...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 19:41:36
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kinis Deren wrote: Corey Lean wrote: My only thoughts on the whole thing is: there should be a degree of risk and commitment on the side of the attackers as the defenders already took a risk by putting down there flag in space and spending i...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 18:49:15
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: All this threat of goons being able to troll the whole of nullsec is them simply showing their fear that they won't be able to drop their whole blob across every single one of their systems in defence and will have to split up i...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 18:45:24
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: SilentAsTheGrave wrote: For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honest...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 17:43:58
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kah'Les wrote: Elenahina wrote: Or you could use 20 Rifters and save yourself a couple hundred million ISK. Remember - they can't reinforce it, if you have it linked up too. You don't HAVE to kill the attacker. Just deny him sole control o...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 17:30:30
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: afkalt wrote: I've still not seen a reason that owners should not have to take action though. They are. That's why the attacker is dead. I have still not seen a reason why you think the attacker's influence sh...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 15:03:44
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: You mean like how defenders still need to take action against an RF item, even if it is uncontested? You mean like POSes are completely incapable of regenerating their own shield after they've been reinforced?
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 13:03:42
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Regardless of how it happened, someone came and defended the space. It's obviously space which is still defendable, or it wouldn't be defended. Yes but the point I'm making is this is the ENTIRE reason behind ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 13:02:27
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: afkalt wrote: Terence Bogard wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: As for the timer, I also would like to know this. Hopefully it either goes back to zero immediately, or at the very least ticks down ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 12:53:50
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Zappity wrote: Your considered response appears to be to demonstrate how game breaking the sort of behaviour that you are terrified of will be. I seem to remember similar rhetoric about siphons. I hope ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 12:38:21
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zappity wrote: Your considered response appears to be to demonstrate how game breaking the sort of behaviour that you are terrified of will be. I seem to remember similar rhetoric about siphons. I hope CCP finds a way to neuter your hissy fit r...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 12:33:24
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Papa Digger wrote: Arrendis wrote: Who's talking about holding it? You don't build an apartment building on your game preserve... What a point of grief then? You came, take station.. you leave, you lose station. :) And they lose the ih...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 12:23:31
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |